This device was explanted and returned for analysis.Upon receipt, the lead under complaint was found cut 57cm proximal to the lead tip.Only the distal fragment was returned.The proximal fragment including the is4 connector pin was not returned.An explantation aid was found in the lead body.It is reasonable to assume that the lead was cut during the explantation procedure.The performance of the lead fragment was scrutinized, including a visual inspection.The analysis revealed 45cm proximal to the lead tip that the lead body was found squeezed and deformed.In this area all the conductor coils were found fractured, which is assumed to be the root cause of the reported high pacing lead impedance.Based on the characteristics, as well as the location of the damage, it is reasonable to assume that the lead was subject to excessive mechanical forces as the result of clavicular, first rib entrapment.Further damages such as several cuts into the insulation and a damaged distal end, most likely occurred during the explantation procedure.The manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process.In conclusion, the analysis did not reveal any sign of a material or manufacturing problem.
|