• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 200 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 200 D
Device Problem Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Date 08/31/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The esu was thoroughly inspected/tested.The unit's monopolar socket was found to have been damaged.It appears that the damage was caused by a significant amount of external force applied to the socket.Therefore, the generator was serviced (i.E., repaired and tested).In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the involved device.Most likely, there were many factors involved with the reported event.The output from the unit may have been compromised (i.E., low, inconsistent, etc.) due to a poor electrical connection between the unit and attached instrument which would have been caused by the socket damage.Also, the intervention work was performed in a very thin walled area of the colon on a very large polyp.In addition, bleeding could have reduced visualization.As a result, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the incident.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator).The esu was used in a colonoscopy to remove a very large polyp in the cecum.Information regarding the accessories and settings used during the procedure was not provided.The target tissue area was lifted by saline.During the intervention work, the physician experienced difficulty cutting and hemostasis was insufficient.Approximately 12 hours after the first colonoscopy, a second colonoscopy was performed to address bleeding.During the manipulation of the scope, a perforation to the cecum occurred.An additional surgery was required to address the perforation.The esu was distributed to a hospital in (b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 200 D
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM  
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-9317
7709554400
MDR Report Key10641408
MDR Text Key210272396
Report Number9610614-2020-00035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
K080715
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/07/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 200 D
Device Catalogue Number10140-200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/22/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/11/2020
Initial Date FDA Received10/07/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/09/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
-
-