• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VYGON GMBH PREMICATH; LONG-TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VYGON GMBH PREMICATH; LONG-TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 1261.306
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Material Fragmentation (1261); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problems Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/05/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Sample will be returned to vygon and will be evaluated as part of the complaint investigation.The results of this investigation are still pending and will be communicated with fda within 30 days of completion.
 
Event Description
The 30cm premicath was placed over the left foot on (b)(6) 2020.A position control with sonography and x-ray thorax was performed.The premicath was located in the inferior vena cava.Infusion and medication could be administered without any problems.On (b)(6) 2020 an attempt was made to pull the premicath back, about 3cm could be pulled back without any problems, then a resilient resistance.An attempt was made to mobilize the premicath by turning it slowly with tweezers.The premicath immediately snapped.Thereupon surgical removal of the premicath was necessary.After removal, the premicath was inspected and broke again without any force.10 days lying in bed, therapy glucose 10%, nacl 5.85%, potassium chloride 7.45% (kcl) --> 2ml/h flow rate.
 
Event Description
The 30cm premicath was placed over the left foot on (b)(6) 2020.A position control with sonography and x-ray thorax was performed.The premicath was located in the inferior vena cava.Infusion and medication could be administered without any problems.On (b)(6) 2020 an attempt was made to pull the premicath back, about 3cm could be pulled back without any problems, then a resilient resistance.An attempt was made to mobilize the premicath by turning it slowly with tweezers.The premicath immediately snapped.Thereupon surgical removal of the premicath was necessary.After removal, the premicath was inspected and broke again without any force.10 days lying in bed, therapy glucose 10%, nacl 5.85%, potassium chloride 7.45% (kcl) 2ml/h flow rate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
We received three catheter fragments as reference samples for this complaint.The first fragment was the catheter tip up to approx.11.3 cm.The second fragment had a length of approx.14 cm and extended to the end of the 25 cm mark.The third fragment was the proximal rest of the catheter tube (with a 30 cm mark) and was still in a cut cannula.Microscopic examination showed some lighter fibrin on the tube fragments, especially on fragment 1 and 2.All fractures of the catheter tubing showed a rough surface, the typical appearance of a fracture under too high tensile force.In addition, the proximal end of the second fragment showed some radial cracks, as they can occur when the catheter tube is stretched.Fibrin formation indicates a patient reaction.This can occur in very rare cases and have various reasons: allergic reaction of the patient to latex, if latex gloves (also unpowdered) are worn when inserting the catheter.Allergic patient reaction to pur (in very rare cases).Poor/unfavorable catheter placement, so that the intima is irritated by catheter movements.Presence of hospital bacteria (at the catheter tip).There were no abnormalities when checking the batch documentation.A leak and flow test are performed on each catheter.A tensile strength test is carried out on a random basis as an in-process test.The tensile values of the pure catheter tube were 3.7 n and therefore conformed to our specification (min.1.5 n).Finally, there are two 100% completeness visual inspections and a sealed seam inspection.For all components there is an incoming goods inspection.This is the fourth complaint regarding batch 280120gn and the 22nd complaint regarding a broken catheter tube for code 1261.306 within the last three years.The general complaint rate for code 1261.306 in the years 2015 to 2018 is 3,75 % no further corrective action initiated by quality management as there are no indications of a manufacturing fault.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PREMICATH
Type of Device
LONG-TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
VYGON GMBH
prager ring 100
aachen 52070
GM  52070
MDR Report Key10655883
MDR Text Key210617783
Report Number2245270-2020-00097
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K041468
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/13/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number1261.306
Device Lot Number280120GN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/09/2020
Initial Date FDA Received10/09/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/09/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/14/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-