Estimated date of event.The udi is unknown because the lot and part number were not provided.Estimated date of implant the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot numbers were not provided.A conclusive cause for the reported ischemia and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined; however, the reported treatments appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.The reported patient effect of ischemia is listed in the xience v everolimus eluting coronary stent systems instructions for use as a known patient effect of coronary stenting procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.Literature: "scaffold underexpansion and late lumen loss after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: insights from absorb japan trial." the absorb scaffold referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
It was reported through a research presentation identifying absorb scaffolds and xience stents that may be related to the following: myocardial infarction, thrombosis, restenosis, ischemia, revascularization, rehospitalization and issues with strut apposition for absorb scaffolds.This article summarizes clinical outcomes of 400 patients that were treated with absorb scaffolds and xience stents.Specific patient information is documented as unknown.Details are listed in the article, titled "scaffold underexpansion and late lumen loss after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: insights from absorb japan trial." +mean gender is male.
|