• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETABULAR CUP HAP 52MM WITH IMPACTOR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETABULAR CUP HAP 52MM WITH IMPACTOR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Model Number 74120152
Device Problem Compatibility Problem (2960)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Injury (2348); Neuralgia (4413); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 05/07/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed on the patient left hip due to severe pain, limited mobility, elevated metal ion levels and metallosis.Among the intra-operative findings were adverse soft local tissue reaction with fluid collections around the implant; metallosis and elevated metal ions as a result of the premature failure of the device.The patient's outcome is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision the bhr cup remained implanted and the bhr head was removed these devices were used in treatment.As of today additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr head and bhr cup, hemi head and modular sleeve was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the bhr cup.Similar complaints have been identified for the bhr head.However, as bhr systems of this size are no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the known devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The clinical information provided, of the reported elevated metal ion levels and soft tissue reaction may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.However, the source and the root cause cannot be determined with the available documentation.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical findings are associated with the implant failure.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision the bhr head was removed.The bhr cup remained implanted.The devices were used in treatment.As of today, additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr head and bhr cup was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the bhr cup.Similar complaints have been identified for the bhr head.However, as bhr systems of this size are no longer sold, no action is to be taken.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the known devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The primary surgery was done almost 8 years prior to the revision surgery.The implantation operative report and chartstiks listed the bhr acetabular cup as a 52-mm; however, the surgeon noted ¿sequential reaming of the acetabulum up to a size 52 socket which gave us good pressfit.We then impacted the real size 50 socket into place.¿ the revision surgery was reportedly done (b)(6) 2019 secondary to ¿adverse soft local tissue reaction with fluid collections around the implant; metallosis and elevated metal ions as a result of the premature failure of the device¿.However, none of this was mentioned in the revision operative report.The impact to the patient beyond the pain, the revision surgery and the recovery cannot be determined.The clinical information provided, of the reported elevated metal ion levels and soft tissue reaction may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.It cannot be concluded based on the chartstik and the implant report if the surgeon under-reamed the size of the shell.However, the source and the root cause cannot be determined with the available documentation.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical findings are associated with the implant failure.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint.The investigation remains inconclusive and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACETABULAR CUP HAP 52MM WITH IMPACTOR
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
MDR Report Key10671865
MDR Text Key211101452
Report Number3005975929-2020-00383
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010502575
UDI-Public03596010502575
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/02/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/13/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/01/2016
Device Model Number74120152
Device Catalogue Number74120152
Device Lot Number11AW31315
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/02/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-