• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA CANADA CORP. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA CANADA CORP. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number PVS21
Device Problem Degraded (1153)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 06/15/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The manufacturer was informed of an early degeneration of the perceval treated by valve in valve, with corvalve 23.No further information is presently available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device was not explanted and the serial number is unknown, no device investigation is possible at this time.Based on the limited information available, it is not possible to draw a definitive conclusion on the reported event.It should be noted that structural valve deterioration is listed as a possible adverse event in the perceval ifu.The event is, therefore, a known inherent risk of the device.Should further information be provided, the manufacturer will provide an update to this reporting activity.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer was informed of an early degeneration of the perceval s valve treated by valve in valve, with corvalve 23.The perceval s was implanted in 2014 in mini sternotomy.No further information is presently available.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2014, a perceval valve pvs21 was implanted in aortic position via mini-sternotomy.The valve degeneration was first observed in (b)(6) 2019.The patient was treated by valve-in-valve in (b)(6) 2020.The manufacturer received additional information from the site identifying the following information.After the initial implantation of the perceval in postoperative, good hemodynamic state, absence of bleeding by redons.Correct compresses count.Electro-entrained rhythm on the electrocardiogram.In 2020 the patient was rehospitalized in cardiology to discuss a valve-in-valve aortic valve replacement in a context of bioprosthesis degeneration.Degeneration of bioprosthesis confirmed via echo with an average gradient of 55 mmhg across the aortic valve, paroxysmal anticoagulated af.Patient has a history of a kidney transplant in 2010 with dialysis since (b)(6) 2014 following graft dysfunction.In 2019 a assessment confirmed prosthesis degradation.There is a definite indication for hip prosthesis in the context of osteoarthritis.The patient requirement is high due to limited physical activity due to hip pain.Preoperative workup with coronary artery control found an atheromatous coronary network without significant lesion.Dampened flow and systolic ascension time increases on all asds in relation to aortic valve shrinkage.Dialysis fistula presence.Tavi procedure with a evolut pro 23mm valve was performed in (b)(6) of 2020.Review on (b)(6) 2020 confirmed good positioning of the evolut valve.Since the device was not explanted and the serial number is unknown, no device investigation is possible at this time.Structural valve deterioration is identified as a major cause of failure of bioprosthetic heart valves.It is possible that the patient¿s clinical history and risk factors (severe hypertension, ischemic heart disease) may have contributed to the structural valve deterioration observed in this perceval s valve.However a definitive root cause cannot be stated at this time.It should be noted that structural valve deterioration is listed as a possible adverse event in the perceval ifu as a known inherent risk of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the device was not explanted and the serial number is unknown, no device investigation is possible at this time.Based on the information available, it is not possible to draw a definitive conclusion on the reported event.It is possible that the patient¿s clinical history and risk factors may have contributed to the structural valve deterioration observed in this perceval s valve.It should be noted that structural valve deterioration is listed as a possible adverse event in the perceval ifu.The event is, therefore, a known inherent risk of the device.The manufacturer is submitting this as a late report.Due to an internal error the manufacturers sales team received the operational report but the operational report was not received by the customer quality team within the required timeline.Updated sections: b4, b5, d4, d6a, f6, f7.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
TISSUE HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA CANADA CORP.
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc
MDR Report Key10673837
MDR Text Key211448307
Report Number1718850-2020-01170
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/16/2020,03/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/13/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPVS21
Device Catalogue NumberICV1208
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date09/28/2020
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer09/16/2020
Date Manufacturer Received02/11/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-