A literature article entitled, "a randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser¿assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery," listed adverse events that occurred post operatively whereas an intraocular lens (iol) was implanted inside the eye at the time of the event.There was no indications provided that the iol was not associated with the events.The events discussed were corneal edema 6 cases, vitreous prolapse 1 case, macular edema 7 cases, anterior uveitis 2 cases, hypotony 1 case, suprachoroidal hemorrhage 1 case, lens decentration 1 case and lens explanted 1 case.The study involved 400 eyes that were implanted with the iol.The events reported did not distinguish any individual patient information nor event date information.Additional information is not available.
|
The product was not returned for analysis.Complaint history and product history records could not be reviewed because the report did not provide a lot number or any identification traceable to the manufacturing documentation.A malfunction has not been indicated against the product.The file has been opened from a literature report: a randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser¿assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery.The default intraocular lens used for in-the-bag placement was the company lens.Patients were reviewed at 4 weeks postoperatively to perform clinical examination, assess for complications, and gather postoperative data.None of the events were indicated as attributable to the implanted iol.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|