The affected complaint device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a product analysis could not be performed.As device information was not made available, device history record, risk management review and complaint history review cannot be completed.There is no information that would suggest the device failed to meet specifications.A relationship, if any, between the device and the reported incident could not be corroborated.According to clinical/medical investigation, this case reports the patient was taken to the or for i&d of surgical site infections, believed to be the result of a latent infection.As part of the i&d procedure, the poly insert was exchanged.To date, the requested surgical records and x-rays have not been provided to fully evaluate the root cause of the reported infection.Therefore, patient impact beyond the revision cannot be determined.No further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should clinically relevant documentation or information become available, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.No medical documents were received for investigation.Therefore, no medical assessment can be performed at this time.Infection, a potential complication associated with any surgery, can occur and possible causes could include but not limited to contamination, patient reaction, and post-operative healing issue.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Per the senior author, none of the complications were implant related and were as the article implied, procedure related.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.
|