Catalog Number 42055150-120 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/06/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion with heavy calcification in the popliteal artery.The first 5.5 x 150 mm supera stent was implanted in the patient and a second 5.5 x 150 mm supera stent delivery system was advancing; however, resistance was met with the guide wire and the tip separated while outside of the patient¿s anatomy.A non-abbott stent was used to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The investigation determined that case circumstances likely contributed to the reported difficulties.It is likely that the handling of the device while attempting to advance through the challenging anatomy caused nose cone tip to separate.Furthermore, once outside the anatomy, continued use likely contributed to the partial stent deployment.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.D10 and h3: the device was originally reported as returning; however, additional information was received that the device will not be returned for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported separation was found on the inner member.There was noted damage to the inner member (stretched) likely due to case circumstances.Difficulty to advance was not tested due to device condition.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The investigation determined that case circumstances likely contributed to the reported difficulties.It is likely that the handling of the device while attempting to advance through the challenging anatomy caused inner member to separate.Furthermore, once outside the anatomy, continued use likely contributed to the partial stent deployment and noted stretch on the inner member.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.D10, h3 - it was initially reported that the device would not be returning for analysis.Subsequent information revealed that the device was returned for evaluation.H6 - method code 4114 removed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|