The device has been reported as discarded, therefore no product investigation can be performed, and the customer complaint cannot be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 30412912l number, and no internal action related to the complaint was found during the review.(b)(4).If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's ref.# (b)(4).
|
It was reported that a male patient (100kg) underwent a cardiac ablation procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with a thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter and suffered cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis and surgical intervention.During the ablation phase, a perforation to the roof of the left atrium (la) right beside the right superior vein occurred with the thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter.Reminder of the procedure was aborted.Pericardiocentesis was performed to drain the fluid from the pericardial space.The patient was sent to the operating room for surgical intervention to close the perforation.The patient was expected to stay an additional day at least.Patient had fully recovered from the issue.The physician believed the issue occurred because of the way he used the equipment.Transseptal puncture was performed with a cook needle.There was no evidence of steam pop during the ablation.The catheter irrigation was set at 15ml/ minute flow rate at 45 watts.The force visualization features used included graph, dashboard, vector and visitag.At the time of perforation, a hi force alert came up and the catheter visually moved outside the carto generated heart geometry.The parameters for stability used with the visitag module were 2ml range, 3 seconds, force over time (fot) of 25%, and tag size of 2mm.Fti was used as coloring option.No other visitag filters were used.The procedure delayed by 60 minutes.The patient did not get any ssi (surgical side infection) due to the delay experienced.
|