• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5MAXJET7KIT
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/24/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the jet7 was kinked approximately 3.5 and 80.0 cm from the hub.The marker band was damaged at the distal tip of the jet7.The entire length of the returned jet7 was intact.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned jet7 was unable to confirm the reported distal fracture.The entire length of the returned jet7 was intact.Further evaluation revealed the distal markerband was damaged.This damage may have been due to handling during use.Additionally, there were kinks on the proximal and mid-shaft of the device.This damage was likely incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7), a non-penumbra microcatheter, a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), a guidewire and a penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68).During the procedure, the physician advanced the jet7 and microcatheter over the guidewire through the neuron max and into the target vessel to aspirate the clot with no reported resistance.During aspiration while retracting the jet7, the catheter fractured distally.Therefore, the physician removed the jet7 and the fractured tip remained in the patient.Upon removal, it was noticed that the proximal end of the jet7 was kinked.The procedure was completed using an ace68, the same neuron max and microcatheter.However, the fractured distal tip of the jet7 was displaced into the anterior cerebral artery (aca) and was left in the patient¿s body as it was too distal to be retrieved.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.After the procedure, the jet7 fractured at the mid-shaft of while it was being packed into the box.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key10765488
MDR Text Key214143647
Report Number3005168196-2020-01856
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019925
UDI-Public00814548019925
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodePL
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,09/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/02/2022
Device Model Number5MAXJET7KIT
Device Catalogue Number5MAXJET7KIT
Device Lot NumberF94590
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/13/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/30/2020
Initial Date FDA Received10/30/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/03/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age82 YR
-
-