• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR-UTAH-SALT LAKE CITY TREVO XP PROVUE 4MM X 30MM; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR-UTAH-SALT LAKE CITY TREVO XP PROVUE 4MM X 30MM; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER Back to Search Results
Model Number 90185
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 02/10/2020
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device is unavailable to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the subject device (retriever) was used in the procedure with other devices to treat occlusion at m1.The meandering of blood vessels was weak.After easily reaching the block with the guide wire and catheter, the resistance was encountered while inserting the subject device (retriever) into the catheter, and it got stuck.After that, the physician was pushing and pulling to move the subject device (retriever), and it was suddenly jumped out of the tip of the catheter and fully deployed.At that time, the blood vessels of m2 were damaged and bleeding.The physician indicated that the resistance was caused the blood vessels to shift downwards, which caused them to tear.The subject device (retriever) was pulled, but it was stuck, and could not be stored in the catheter.Finally, the subject device (retriever) was withdrawn together with the catheter, and the subject device (retriever) was removed from the catheter (the stent was not transected).The bleeding area was treated with the catheter and the physician thought the subject device (retriever) would be easy to lift because it was easy to guide the catheter to the treatment area.It was reported that the patient had passed away 3 days after surgery and the death was related to the subject device (retriever).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the results of the dhr (device history record) review, there is no indication that the device, labeling or packaging failed to meet its specifications when released.The subject device was not available; therefore, a visual inspection as well as a functional evaluation could not be performed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.Additional information provided by the customer indicated that a marksman microcatheter was used in the procedure and there was no resistance as the marksman passed through the blood clot.However, the doctor felt resistance in delivering the trevo.This resistance caused the blood vessels to shift downwards, which caused them to tear.While there are a number of potential causes for the reported issue, because review and analysis of available information failed to identify a definitive cause and the device was not returned, an assignable cause of undeterminable will be assigned to this complaint.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the subject device (retriever) was used in the procedure with other devices to treat occlusion at m1.The meandering of blood vessels was weak.After easily reaching the block with the guide wire and catheter, the resistance was encountered while inserting the subject device (retriever) into the catheter and it got stuck.After that, the physician was pushing and pulling to move the subject device (retriever), and it was suddenly jumped out of the tip of the catheter and fully deployed.At that time, the blood vessels of m2 were damaged and bleeding.The physician indicated that the resistance was caused the blood vessels to shift downwards, which caused them to tear.The subject device (retriever) was pulled but it was stuck and could not be stored in the catheter.Finally, the subject device (retriever) was withdrawn together with the catheter and the subject device (retriever) was removed from the catheter (the stent was not transected).The bleeding area was treated with the catheter and the physician thought the subject device (retriever) would be easy to lift because it was easy to guide the catheter to the treatment area.It was reported that the patient had passed away 3 days after surgery and the death was related to the subject device (retriever).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TREVO XP PROVUE 4MM X 30MM
Type of Device
CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR-UTAH-SALT LAKE CITY
4870 west 2100 south
salt lake city UT 84120
MDR Report Key10771535
MDR Text Key214144883
Report Number3012931345-2020-00176
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815742001853
UDI-Public00815742001853
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K150616
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/23/2021
Device Model Number90185
Device Catalogue Number90185
Device Lot Number0000030261
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/12/2020
Initial Date FDA Received11/02/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/22/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/12/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
GUIDEWIRE (UNKNOWN MANUFACTURING); MARKSMAN MICROCATHETER; GUIDEWIRE (UNKNOWN MANUFACTURING); MARKSMAN MICROCATHETER
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Other;
-
-