Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 10/13/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Reporter had indicated that product will not be returned.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the device was worn and fractured.Attempt for further information has been made, but no further information has been provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
No further event information available at the time of this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The returned instrument exhibits signs of repeated use (nicked or gouged) and the locking feature is fractured on the medial & lateral side of the post.Not all pieces were returned.The dhr was reviewed and no discrepancies relevant to the reported event were found.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Evaluation of the returned device identified the fracture was consistent with the tasp fractures analyzed in a zrm.The zrm identified that the common failure modes for the tasp devices include either bending overload or low cycle fatigue culminating in bending overload as evident by the presence of hackle marks, river lines and striations features on the fracture surface if any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|