It was reported that this was an unknown procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.Suction feature of the electrode was out of order right after the beginning.There was no surgical delay, and no harm to the patient.The device was brand new, and the first use when the issue occurred.Additional information provided by the affiliate reported the case was completed, but additional details were not available.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.According to the information provided, it was reported that the suction feature of the electrode was out of order right after the beginning.The complaint device was not returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.Since the complaint device was not returned, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If the device is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [u1912098] number, and no non-conformances were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|