Date of event: estimated.Date of implant: estimated.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record and complaint history could not be conducted because the lot number was not provided.The patient effects/treatments listed are consistent with the product risk profile and are therefore expected.Factors that may contribute to the performance outcomes listed in the article include, but are not limited to, device to patient interaction, patient anatomical conditions, device to user interaction and manufacturing or material issues.Due to the limited information available, the exact root cause cannot be determined.A conclusive cause for the difficulties listed can not be determined based on the limited information available.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.Article title "one-year results following a pre-specified absorb implantation strategy in st-elevation myocardial infarction (bvs stemi strategyit study)".The other events listed in the article are reported under different mfr report numbers.
|
It was reported through a research article identifying the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (bvs) may be related to the following: after pre-dilatation of the lesion in the mid left anterior descending artery, a 2.5x18mm absorb scaffold was implanted but was not post dilated.Ten months' post implant, target lesion re-vascularization was performed via elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a drug eluting stent.Details are listed in the attached article, titled "one-year results following a pre-specified absorb implantation strategy in st-elevation myocardial infarction (bvs stemi strategy-it study)".Please see article for additional information.Specifically, this event captures case 6 from table 3 in the article.
|