COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Stenosis (2263); Restenosis (4576)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
|
Event Description
|
Bausback et al 2019 (zilver ptx) ¿ ¿drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon revascularization in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease¿ after successful lesion crossing, but before lesion preparation (e.G., pre-dilatation), patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to primary stent implantation with the drug-eluting self-expandable nitinol zilver ptx platform stent (cook medical) or balloon angio-plasty with a dcb.Lesions were stratified by length into 3 categories (lesion length 10 cm, >10 cm to 20 cm, and >20 cm to 30 cm), with approximately 50 patients in each stratum.Des and dcb were intended to fully cover the target lesion and were placed at least 1 cm below the origin of the sfa and above the medial femoral epicondyle, with a maximum lesion length of 30 cm.Des post-dilation was at the operator¿s discretion to achieve a residual stenosis <30%.Freedom from cd-tlr at 12 months was high in both groups (dcb 92.5%, des 90.0%) but dropped to around 70% at 3 years (dcb 71.3%, des 68.9%).Tlr rates in des group 10% at 12 months and 31.1% at 3 years.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation the zisv6 device of unknown lot number involved in this complaint was implanted in the patient and was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.This file will capture the potential that these events occurred in germany, pr (b)(4) will capture the potential that these events occurred in belgium.Document review as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution zisv6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl it should be noted that restenosis of the stented artery is listed as a known potential adverse event within the instructions for use (ifu0117-5).There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu.Root cause review a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to patient pre-existing/underlying conditions.From the literature article it is known that patient pre-existing conditions included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, coronary artery disease (cad), renal insufficiency, obesity, history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, history of vascular surgery and rutherford classifications between 2 and 5.Restenosis of the stented artery is also listed as a known potential adverse event within the ifu and is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures that can be caused by injury to the vessel (e.G.During percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) and/or stenting).Vessel injury provokes an inflammatory response that leads to or amplifies the restenosis process.It may be noted that the surface of the zilver ptx stent is coated with the drug paclitaxel to help prevent subsequent restenosis of the artery.Summary complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.The patient outcome is unknown.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
Final mdr being submitted due to completion of invesitgation on 11-oct-21.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|