D.4.Lot number has been updated from 'hmhr' to 'hnhr'.Visual inspection: the device was inspected, and it was observed that the screw was positioned in the locked state; however, the inner collet was not completely flush with the outer collet.Analysis of the provided radiological images confirmed that rod slippage had occurred at the distal end of the construct.Functional inspection: some resistance was experienced during locking/unlocking.Device and complaint history records were reviewed for this lot, and no relevant manufacturing issues or similar complaints were identified.Per mesa surgical technique: these internal fixation devices are load sharing devices which maintain alignment until healing occurs.If healing is delayed or does not occur, the implant could eventually break, bend, or loosen.Incidence of pseudoarthrosis could allow for continued dynamic motion within the construct, leading to the axial slip along the rod.Upon review of the part, it was observed that the screw was positioned in the locked state; however, the inner collet was not completely flush with the outer collet.Analysis of the provided radiological images confirmed that rod slippage had occurred at the distal end of the construct.It is possible that non-union contributed to the failure.
|