As reported, prior to using a filiform ureteral stent set, the stent was broken when the user tested the tensile strength.The stent separated into two sections.The device did not make patient contact.The procedure was completed by changing to another new device.No adverse effects have been reported due to the alleged malfunction.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary: as reported, prior to using a filiform ureteral stent set, the stent was broken when the user tested the tensile strength.The stent separated into two sections.The device did not make patient contact.The procedure was completed by changing to another new device.No adverse effects have been reported due to the alleged malfunction.Investigation - evaluation.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.One filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set was returned for investigation in a prior to use condition.No damage was observed on the wire guide or positioner.The stent was returned separated into two segments.The proximal segment measured 19.2cm with the coil still attached.The point of separation is angular and did not occur at a sideport.The tether remained attached and was tangled around the proximal coil.The distal segment measured 8.7cm with the distal coil still attached.The points of separation have mating fractures, indicating no missing pieces.Magnification of the severed ends shows the stent was cut and pulled to separation.A document-based investigation evaluation was also performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and no other lot-related complaints have been received.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.There were no identified gaps in the device manufacturing instructions or quality control procedures.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is packaged with instructions which caution, ¿improper handling can seriously weaken the stent.Acute bending or overstressing during placement may result in subsequent separation of the stent at the point of stress after a prolonged indwelling period.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that the cause of the stent separation was the customer tensile testing the device.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|