Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the reported condition was confirmed.However, the assignable root cause could not be established.A review of the service history record indicates that the device has been serviced within the last year for a service condition that is relevant to the current reported condition.However, the root cause of the failure was found to be irrelevant, therefore no further actions are required.Udi: (b)(4).
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the battery handpiece failed testing for lid leak tightness, was jammed/seized, the trigger did not move smoothly, the housing was bent and there was component damage.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for check for sticky triggers, check function of device, check roundness of housing, check for mechanical free moving and leakage test using bubble emission technique.It was noted in the service order that the device had an unspecified malfunction.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The date of event was unknown but was known to have occurred in 2020.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|