This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary =according to the information provided, it was reported that while harvesting the semitendinosus tendon, the tendon tear prematurely so the tendon was too short to use as a replacement for the acl reconstruction.The surgeon complain that a part of this problem was that the stripper was not sharp enough.Surgeon had to harvest a part of the tractus iliotibialis.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observation reveals that the device is in normal use conditions, no structural damages could be found.The markings on the shaft are legible.The shaft is not bent.When reviewing at the distal tip of the device, it could be observed that the tip is dull.According with the visual inspection result, this complaint can be confirmed.This failure can be attributed to fair wear and tear of the device due to repeated use and sterilization cycles.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [19e01] number, and no non-conformances were identified.At this time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted, as the device is fully functional.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family to monitor the extent to which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi:(b)(4).
|