If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.The actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device had unintended motion, a worn motor, the speed could not be controlled or changed, and insufficient/low power.Therefore, the reported condition that the oscillator head did not work was confirmed.The assignable root cause of this condition was determined to be traced to component failure due to normal wear.Udi ¿ (b)(4).
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the battery oscillator device motor was worn and defective, the speed of the device could not be controlled/changed, insufficient/low power, and unintended activation/motion.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for mode-switch test, check oscillation frequency, and check for unintended motion.It was noted in the service order that during an unspecified surgical procedure it was observed that the oscillator head did not work.It was reported that there were no delays to the surgical procedure.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention, or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of the event was not reported, however, it was reported that the event occurred in 2020.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|