The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Based on the available information, the reported atrial perforation appears to be due to procedural conditions.Additionally, the reported respiratory distress was a cascading event of the atrial perforation.The reported patient effects of atrial perforation and respiratory distress are listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, and are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported additional therapy/non-surgical treatment was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is filed to report atrial perforation, respiratory distress and medical intervention it was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat mixed mitral regurgitation (mr) with grade 4.It was noted torrential tricuspid regurgitation (tr).A steerable guide catheter (sgc) was advanced to the mitral valve, and the clip was successfully deployed, reducing mr.However, when the sgc was retrieved to the left atrium, a right to left shunt occurred due to the torrential tr and the patient's oxygen saturation began to drop.Therefore, an atrial septal defect (asd) occluder was implanted for additional treatment.The patient is stable.One clip was implanted, reducing mr to1.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|