Catalog Number CRE14S |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/12/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history record could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the crosser cto recanalization catheters products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the crosser cto recanalization catheters products are identified.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of a highly calcified target lesion of chronic total occlusion in the superficial femoral artery, the tip of the catheter allegedly detached after one and half minute activation.It was further reported that another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the crosser cto recanalization catheters products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the crosser cto recanalization catheters products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 14s crosser cto recanalization catheter was returned for evaluation.During visual evaluation, it was noted that, the distal tip was separated from the outer catheter but still attached to the inner core wire.No functional testing is performed due to the condition of the device.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported material separation.A definitive root cause for the alleged material separation could not be determined based upon the provided information labeling review: the review of the instructions for use, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.H10: d4(expiry date: 10/2021), h11: h6(result and conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of a highly calcified target lesion of chronic total occlusion in the superficial femoral artery, the tip of the catheter allegedly misaligned after one and half minute activation.It was further reported that another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of a highly calcified target lesion of chronic total occlusion in the superficial femoral artery, the tip of the catheter allegedly misaligned after one and half minute activation.It was further reported that another device was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record will be performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the crosser cto recanalization catheters products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the crosser cto recanalization catheters products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: d4(expiry date: 10/2021), g3.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|