|
Catalog Number SGC0705 |
Device Problem
Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); Atrial Perforation (2511)
|
Event Date 11/17/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incident reported from this lot.Based on the available information, a cause the difficult or delayed positioning in anatomy could not be determined.A cause for the atrial perforation could not be determined.The reported patient effect of atrial perforation as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, and is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported additional therapy/non-surgical treatment was a result of case-specific circumstances, as implantation of an occluder device was required to treat the atrial perforation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is being filed to report the atrial septal defect requiring intervention.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4+.When inserting the steerable guide catheter (sgc) resistance was met therefore the sgc was removed and the atrial septum was dilated with a 8mm balloon.The sgc was able to advance without issue.One clip was implanted, reducing mr to <1.After removal of the sgc, a right to left shunt was noted.An amplatzer plug was used as treatment.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incident reported from this lot.Based on the available information, a cause the difficult or delayed positioning in anatomy could not be determined.A cause for the atrial perforation could not be determined.The reported patient effect of atrial perforation as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, and is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported additional therapy/non-surgical treatment was a result of case-specific circumstances, as implantation of an occluder device was required to treat the atrial perforation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incident reported from this lot.Based on the available information, a cause the difficult or delayed positioning in anatomy could not be determined.A cause for the atrial perforation could not be determined.The reported patient effect of atrial perforation as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, and is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported additional therapy/non-surgical treatment was a result of case-specific circumstances, as implantation of an occluder device was required to treat the atrial perforation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|