|
Model Number EMAX2PLUS |
Device Problem
Excessive Heating (4030)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/19/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a supplemental medwatch report will be filed as appropriate.The reporter¿s complete facility address was not provided.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the investigation has been completed, and if additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.Udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during an unspecified surgical procedure, it was discovered that the temperature of the motor device was abnormally high, and the device generated an abnormal noise when it ran.There were no reports of delays to the surgical procedure.It was reported that a spare device was used to complete the surgery.There was patient involvement reported.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a supplemental medwatch report will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: device evaluation: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed, and it was determined that the reported condition was not confirmed.Therefore, an assignable root cause was not determined.However, during evaluation, it was determined that the device ran in locked position.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for safety assessment.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to component failure from normal wear.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|