• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HEAD; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HEAD; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Cyst(s) (1800); Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 06/26/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed on the patient right hip on (b)(6) 2019.The revision surgery was performed due to an adverse local tissue reaction to metal debris and gray-stained tissue and joint fluid; pseudotumor; and elevated cobalt and chromium levels.The patient outcome is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, a manufacturing record, complaint history and device labelling / instructions for use review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.The available medical documents were reviewed.Without the implantation and pre-revision x-rays, it cannot be determined if the acetabular component was excessively anteverted; however, this cannot be ruled out as a contributory factor the reported clinical reactions; as the surgeon noted during the revision he ¿was careful to antevert it less.¿ without the supporting lab/pathology results, imaging and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the root cause of the reported pain, elevated metal ion levels, necrosis, discolored fluid and tissue cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the head and cup were removed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup and bhr head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the head and cup.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.The updated medical information was reviewed; however it relates to the left hip implantation surgery and does not change the previous assessment and conclusion.Without the implantation and pre-revision x-rays, it cannot be determined if the acetabular component was excessively anteverted; however, this cannot be ruled out as a contributory factor the reported clinical reactions; as the surgeon noted during the revision he ¿was careful to antevert it less.¿ without the supporting lab/pathology results, imaging and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the root cause of the reported pain, elevated metal ion levels, necrosis, discolored fluid and tissue cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HEAD
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
MDR Report Key10975249
MDR Text Key220417943
Report Number3005975929-2020-00487
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/09/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/20/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-