Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The bwi product analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The product investigation was subsequently completed.Device evaluation details: the device was visually inspected, and it was found with a hole on pebax, reddish brown material and internal parts exposed.Then, magnetic sensor functionality was tested on carto and the catheter failed, error 105 and 106 were observed.A failure analysis was performed, and the catheter was dissected on the tip area, loss of electrical continuity at the sensor was found, it was determined that the root cause was an internal failure of the sensor.The manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device and identified an internal action related to the reported incident.The necessary actions to ensure the final product quality have been taken and documented in the appropriate quality system.The final quality release criteria were met before this batch was released for distribution.The customer complaint was confirmed, the root cause of the internal failure of the sensor cannot be determined.In addition, there was a previous investigation to reduce magnetic and force sensor internal issues.The root cause of the hole on pebax cannot be related to the manufacturing process since there is evidence that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures, it could be related to the handling of the device during the procedure, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
A patient underwent a ventricular tachycardia ablation procedure with a thermocool® smart touch® sf bi-directional navigation catheter for which biosense webster¿s product analysis lab identifieda hole on the pebax with reddish brown material inside and internal parts exposed.During the procedure at the start of ablation, the contact force displayed hi.An error 88 appeared.An hour after the catheter was inserted, the indication of hi remained even without ablation.An error 85 then appeared.The cable was changed but the issue continued.The catheter was then changed and the issue resolved.The procedure was completed without patient consequence.The force issue is not mdr-reportable.The hole on the pebax is an mdr-reportable issue.
|