• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Stenosis (2263); Restenosis (4576)
Event Date 01/16/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) #: p100022/s027.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Miki 2020, zilver ptx.-"impact of ivus-derived vessel size on midterm outcomes after stent implantation in femoropopliteal lesions".Purpose: to identify intravascular ultrasound (ivus) findings that predict midterm stent patency in femoropopliteal (fp) lesions.This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single center on all consecutive patients who underwent ivus examination during angioplasty and stenting of isolated de novo fp lesions between january 2010 and december 2015.Evt with primary stenting was performed via an ipsilateral or contralateral femoral approach through 6-f sheaths.Following successful navigation of a 0.014- or 0.018-inch guidewire across the target site, the lesion was predilated using a balloon with a diameter equal to the reference vessel diameter (rvd) according to visual angiographic estimation.Balloon inflation was maintained at a pressure of 4 to 10 atmospheres for 30 to 60 seconds and repeated routinely 2 to 4 times at the same segment.Subsequently, self-expanding bns [innova (boston scientific marlborough, ma, usa); misago (terumo corp, tokyo, japan); s.M.A.R.T.Control (cordis, miami lakes, fl, usa); or zilver (cook medical, bloomington, in, usa)] or drug-eluting stents(zilver ptx; cook medical) with diameters that were 1 to 2 mm larger than the rvd were deployed.Postdilation was performed routinely in all lesions with a balloon corresponding to the rvd at a pressure of 14 atmospheres.Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg/d + cilostazol 100 mg/d, ticlopidine 200 mg/d, or clopidogrel 75 mg/d) was started at least 1 week prior to evt and continued for at least 6 months following stent implantation.Initial success was defined as a residual stenosis <30% and the absence of a flow-limiting dissection on angiography.This file will capture 42 cases of restenosis requiring target limb revascularisation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # p100022/s027.Device evaluation: the unknown devices of unknown lot number involved in this complaint were implanted in the patients and were not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation ¿ n/a.Document review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution zisv6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.It should be noted that restenosis of the stented artery is listed as a known potential adverse event within the instructions for use (ifu0117-5).There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu.Image review ¿ n/a.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to patient pre-existing/underlying conditions.From the literature article it is known that patient pre-existing conditions included hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, renal insufficiency and chronic limb-threating ischemia.Restenosis of the stented artery is also listed as a known potential adverse event within the ifu and is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures that can be caused by injury to the vessel (e.G.During percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) and/or stenting).Vessel injury provokes an inflammatory response that leads to or amplifies the restenosis process.It may be noted that the surface of the zilver ptx stent is coated with the drug paclitaxel to help prevent subsequent restenosis of the artery.Summary: complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.The (b)(4) patients required target limb revascularisation.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
aisling hassett
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key10993107
MDR Text Key220968299
Report Number3001845648-2020-00940
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date01/16/2020
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/13/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/11/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/13/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-