• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC15
Device Problem Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
Patient Problem Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815)
Event Date 11/23/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Additional information was requested, and the following was received: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? not known.On what date did the implant take place? (b)(6) 2020.What is the lot number of the linx device? unknown.When using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? standard surgeon sizing technique by the surgeon.Did the patient have an autoimmune disease? not known.Is the patient currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? not known.Did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? not known.How severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? not known - but patient requested removal.Were there any intra-operative complications during implant? not to my knowledge.Was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? yes.Were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? patient was reportedly not following the eating/food size protocol.Besides dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? patient request.Was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? not known.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was scheduled to have the linx device repositioned and prior to the procedure the patient elected to have the device removed.The patient was having dysphagia and this is the reason for having the device removed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 01/06/2021.Device analysis: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 15B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
MDR Report Key11003071
MDR Text Key221271666
Report Number3008766073-2020-00197
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005356
UDI-Public00855106005356
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/23/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/14/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLXMC15
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC15
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/15/2020
Date Manufacturer Received12/15/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-