Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device was not returned for evaluation.
|
This case concerns an (b)(6) year-old female who previously had anal surgery (surgery type and date unknown) and reported to have used laxatives life-long.Due to faecal incontinence, tai with peristeen was initiated in (b)(6) 2020 after instructions by a coloplast home care nurse, but no information on pattern of use.As the patient had rejected the possibility of a stoma, tai with peristeen was final option for management of fecal incontinence.Between (b)(6), the patient experienced difficulties with irrigation that resulted in progressive bleeding, abdominal pain, and fever.No defects were observed on the system and catheters.The patient consulted her physician and was hospitalized.A bowel perforation located 10-12 cm above the anal sphincter was confirmed with no reports of peritonitis, and the patients was treated conservatively, ¿nutrition by infusion¿.On november 20th after 2 weeks of hospitalization the patient was discharged.The patient had lost weight, was still weak and it was recommended to continue with a light diet to support healing of the lesion.The patient and her family are not willing to provide further information.
|