The affected complaint device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a product analysis could not be performed.As device information was not made available, device history record and complaint history review cannot be completed.According to clinical/medical evaluation, for the first revision (report number: 1020279-2020-06096), the clinical information provided, of the elevated metal ion levels, the pseudotumor and metal staining may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.However, the source and the root cause cannot be determined with the available documentation.It cannot be concluded that the reported clinical findings are associated with the implant failure.For the second and third revisions and interventions, the root cause cannot be definitively concluded.It is unknown if the combination of components, the documented pelvic deformity and the poor tissue and bone quality contributed to the issues.There is no information that would suggest the device failed to meet specifications.A relationship, if any, between the device and the reported incident could not be corroborated.No medical documents were received for investigation.Therefore, no medical assessment can be performed at this time.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Internal complaint reference number: case-2020-00033532-1.
|
H10: this complaint (our reference: (b)(4)/mdr reference: 1020279-2020-07504) has been reassessed based on the existing evidence made available to the manufacturer.This record was initially created to investigate a revision surgery performed on (b)(6) 2020 due to recurrent dislocations.However, based on the surgical history of the patient and the operative notes made available to the manufacturer, it has been determined that no smith+nephew devices have been involved following the revision surgery conducted on (b)(6) 2020 due to a fractured echelon stem and a sustained periprosthetic femoral fracture (our reference: (b)(4)/mdr reference: 1020279-2020-06096).Given that the medical documentation available indicates that the revision surgery performed on (b)(6)2020 due to recurrent dislocations involved zimmer-biomet devices, it has been determined that this event does not fulfill reporting requirements per the provisions listed in 21 cfr §803.We now consider this record closed, and no further investigation is warranted at this moment.
|