Catalog Number 8605310 |
Device Problems
Gas Output Problem (1266); Failure to Deliver (2338); Intermittent Communication Failure (4038)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/08/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation has just started; results will be provided in a follow-up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the machine shut off during use.There was no patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The log file was analyzed whereby it was determined that the device passed the automatic power-on self-test (post) in the morning of the date of event without deviations.The respective surgical procedure ran stable and unremarkable until the self-monitoring function detected a communication problem between the cpu board that controls the gas dosage and the user interface.In a situation where ventilator and gas mixer enter a fail state simultaneously the supervisor software routine is designed to switch-off both subsystems.Other than reported the device did not shut itself completely off but went into the so-called "safety mode" and alerted the user to this condition by means of a corresponding alarm.If such deviation would occur during use the user has to set up adequate oxygen and a-gas flows manually to perform manual ventilation with the in-built breathing bag; monitoring functionalities of the device are not affected by this kind of error condition.The procedure how to establish the emergency gas supply is laid down in the ifu.In the particular case the user was able to oercome the situation by rebooting the device; the respective procedure was continued for more than 3 hours without further issues.Dräger knows a certain number of similar events - none of these cases could be traced back to a clear root cause.The fact that the identical type of board is used in the workstation twice and does not exhibit malfunctions in the second application periphery makes a general design issue rather unlikely.The fact that rebooting the device removed the error condition substantiate the validity of this assessment.A reasonable explanation would be electrostatic discharge of the user during interaction with the device or any other kind of electromagnetic disturbance that exceeds the immunity barriers of the device.The apollo was developed in compliance to the requirements of iec 60601-1-2.The number of similar cases is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the machine shut off during use.There was no patient injury reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|