H3, h6: a hemi head (part 74122550, lot 08mw20363) and modular sleeve (details obscured) were received for investigation following hip revision surgery performed due to pain and metallosis.All of the devices were used in treatment.As of today, additional information has been requested for this complaint but have not become available.Without definitive part/lot numbers a complaint history review, manufacturing record review and device labelling / ifu review could not be performed for the cup, sleeve and stem involved.A review of the complaint history for the hemi head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.The production records were reviewed for the known device involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.Visual inspection was carried out on the returned devices.Fine scratches and discolouration were observed on the bearing surface of the head.Damage was observed on the rim of the head.The sleeve could not be separated from the head without using excessive force.Wear analysis was performed to review linear wear on the bearing surface of the hemi head.The wear images identified a wear patch on the bearing surface of the hemi head.Maximum linear wear for the hemi head was 29.5m.Measurement of the vertical straightness profile of the internal sleeve taper showed material loss to a maximum depth of 150.7m.Time in vivo is needed to compare the measured linear wear for this device with the historical wear data for a non-edge loaded smith and nephew large diameter metal-on-metal device.Material loss was measured on the internal taper of the sleeve.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the ¿rising cobalt and chromium levels¿, reported pain and metallosis cannot be confirmed, and it cannot be concluded that the reported reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.Based on the analysis of the returned parts and the information provided the root cause remains undetermined after investigation.If additional information becomes available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.The devices will be retained at smith+nephew and are available upon request.
|