ARTHROCARE CORP. PROCISE LW COBLATOR II; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number EICA7070-01 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Connection Problem (2900)
|
Patient Problems
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/01/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a palatine tonsil resection procedure, when the tissue resection was started there was some bleeding but the procise was not coagulating and it was found that the electrode was incomplete due to the increased level of bleeding in the patient.The procedure was successfully completed with a delay greater than 30min, using a back-up device.No other complications were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was an isolated issue.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.There were no indications that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a palatine tonsil resection procedure, when the tissue resection was started there was some bleeding but the procise was not coagulating and it was found that the electrode was incomplete due to the increased level of bleeding in the patient.The electrode was worn and felt inside the patient's anatomy.At the beginning it was a normal level of bleeding but during the novelty the level of bleeding increased.The procedure was successfully completed with a delay greater than 30min, using a back-up device.No other complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.A clinical review revealed the patient's current condition is unknown and it has not been communicated how the bleeding was treated.Therefore, based on insufficient information, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed at this time.It is unknown if the broken electrode was retrieved from the patient.The coblation wands are manufactured and intended as externally communicating devices and are not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond possible micro-motion and/or migration, and local irritation/discomfort cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should any additional clinical information be provided this complaint will be re-evaluated.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a palatine tonsil resection procedure, when the tissue resection was started there was some bleeding but the precise was not coagulating and it was found that the electrode was incomplete due to the increased level of bleeding in the patient.The electrode was worn and felt inside the patient's anatomy.At the beginning it was a normal level of bleeding but during the novelty the level of bleeding increased.Hydrogen peroxide and adrenaline were used intraoperatively to stop the bleeding.The procedure was successfully completed with a delay greater than 30min, using a back-up device.Patient current status is that its fine.No other complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A visual inspection of the returned instrument shows no manufacturing abnormalities.There is a small piece of electrode detached from wand.The device was plugged into the controller and registered settings (7,3).The wand was able to generate plasma.Coagulation functioned as intended.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.A clinical review revealed the patient's current condition is unknown and it has not been communicated how the bleeding was treated.Therefore, based on insufficient information, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed at this time.It is unknown if the broken electrode was retrieved from the patient.The coblation wands are manufactured and intended as externally communicating devices and are not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond possible micro-motion and/or migration, and local irritation/discomfort cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should any additional clinical information be provided this complaint will be re-evaluated.The complaint for detached electrode was confirmed, but coagulation performed as intended.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: hitting the device tip against a hard surface.Using the device as a lever to enlarge surgical site.(3) mechanical displacement of tissue through applied force.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|