ARTHROCARE CORP. WEREWOLF FLOW 90 COBLATION WAND; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 72290038 |
Device Problem
Unintended Power Up (1162)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/07/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a regenten repair procedure, the wand ablation button constantly stayed on despite the surgeon not pressing the button.Backup device was available to complete the procedure.No significant delay and no patient injuries were reported.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A visual inspection of the returned instrument shows no manufacturing abnormalities.No visual issues were observed.The data was extracted which revealed that the wand was activated previously and experienced a "multiple button pressed notification" error.The device connected to a known good controller, which revealed that the device performed as intended.The error was not present.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The complaint was confirmed.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: the wand´s connector or cable got damaged.Saline /humidity entered the interior of the handle shorting the connection of the buttons.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined since the product was not returned for evaluation.A review of the device history records for the device showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was an isolated event.Visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed since the device was not returned for evaluation.Thus, the complaint could not be verified, nor could a root cause be determined with confidence.Potential factors unrelated to the manufacture or design of the device that could have contributed to the reported event includes: 1) there may have been an issue with one of the concomitant devices in use at the time of this complaint event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.There are no indications to suggest the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this evaluation will be reopened for investigation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|