Udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information provided, it was reported that sleeve damaged.It was reported that during meniscus repair, after insert the needle, the sleeve was damaged as the photo shows.The surgeon suspect the sleeve's strength is not enough.The complaint device is not being returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, photos were provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, the silicone sleeve was damage into the distal part nearest the needle.Since the condition of the sleeve, this complaint can be confirmed.Hands on analysis should provide the evidence necessary to confirm the root cause.The possible root cause can be attributed when not inserting the needle to the proper depth for deployment, can causing damage in the needle or the silicone sleeve, as well as a rough deployment, the sleeve could have damage upon fired.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.A dhr review has been conducted for this batch to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 6l54652, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|