• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 310CJ25
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Incomplete Coaptation (2507); Insufficient Information (3190); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problems Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 12/29/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be submitted.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that an unknown duration post implant of this bioprosthetic mitral valve, it was explanted and replaced with a non-medtronic valve.The valve was replaced due to unspecified structural valve dysfunction.The patient tolerated the procedure well.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic received additional information that the replacement was 9 years and 3 months post implant.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.D4: model #, catalog #, serial #, udi #, expiration date added d6a: implanted date added d9: device available for evaluation? corrected e1: facility name corrected h3: device evaluated? corrected h4: device mfg date added h6: coding corrected medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, visual examination revealed evidence of cauterization along the sewing ring.All leaflets were flexible except where host tissue extends on the inflow and outflow.Tissue deterioration was observed on the right cusp and left cusp approaching the right/left commissure.The free margin of the left cusp is rolled over onto the lunula.A tear on the tunica of the left cusp, along the inflow margin of attachment, appears to be associated with the removal of host tissue during explant.The non-coronary cusp was in the closed position.Due to the tissue deterioration on the right and left cusps, the right cusp was prolapsed.Tissue deterioration observed on the right and left cusps of the left/right commissure.The right/non-coronary and left/non-coronary commissures were intact.Thick glistening off-white pannus covers the tissue and base stitching, into all inferior coaptive areas, and onto all cusps reducing the inflow orifice area and possibly restricting leaflet movement.Remnants of glistening off-white pannus remain attached to the existing sewing ring on the outflow, extending to the right cusp and non-coronary cusp outflow rails slightly covering the top of the left/non-coronary commissure.An unknown amount of pannus ap pears to have been removed during explant.Radiography did not reveal calcification on the returned valve.Conclusions: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is a known adverse event for bioprosthetic heart valves.Based on the risk analysis and historical trend, cuspal tear is a common form of svd which could lead to regurgitation.Pannus, a patient-related condition, would be the common cause for immobile leaflet, a common form of svd which could lead to stenosis.As the returned valve had extensive pannus around the functional areas of the valve, the leaflet and commissure shape and mobilities had been adversely impaired causing prolapse and tears in the tissue.H6: coding updated medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
MDR Report Key11265639
MDR Text Key229823877
Report Number2025587-2021-00399
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/18/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/03/2016
Device Model Number310CJ25
Device Catalogue Number310CJ25
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/27/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/06/2021
Initial Date FDA Received02/02/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/03/2021
05/27/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/04/2021
06/18/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-