The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, this case reports that a revision surgery of an r3 constrained liner and was performed after the patient experienced a dislocation, in which the locking ring broke.It is unknown how long the device was in situ, or whether a traumatic caused the dislocation.To date, the requested medical records and x-rays have not been provided.Therefore, the patient impact beyond the revision cannot be determined.Due to the lack of information provided, a clinical assessment cannot be rendered.Should additional clinically relevant documentation become available, the clinical/medical task may be re-opened.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|