Additional data: d8, d9, h3, h4, h6, h10.Correction: h1.Device records review: review of the device history record for the rod confirmed that it met all of the required quality inspections and criteria prior to release.Device evaluation: the device was evaluated and found to be fractured.Review of the patient¿s x-ray images reveal that the rod was fully distracted.Review of the manufacturing work order confirmed the device passed all inspections per the acceptance tests.The inspection data for the lot was reviewed and confirmed the part met design specifications per the engineering drawings.A definitive cause could not be determined but the type of fracture observed can be a result of a patient¿s daily activities and/or the patient's unique anatomical structure, both of which can influence the amount of stress applied to certain sections of the rod.
|