It was reported by the customer in (b)(6) that during an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the right knee procedure on (b)(6) 2021, it was observed that the tip of the sleeve on the truespan 12 degree peek device was damaged before firing.According to the report, it was deformed/bent and fell apart.Another like device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: according to the information received, it was reported that during the surgery of right knee acl reconstruction, before firing, tip of sleeve was damaged.The product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received and picture provided by customer.Visual analysis of the returned device and picture received, determined that the silicon sleeve was crack and deformed.In addition, the needle was bent in the distal tip.Besides, the implants were deployed from the needle.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number:6l54947, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.Due to the condition of the device received, this complaint can be confirmed.Based on the information currently available.Product evaluation of the returned device indicates that when not inserting the needle to the proper depth for deployment, can causing damage in the needle or the silicone sleeve, as well as a rough deployment, the sleeve could have damage upon fired.As per ifu-113244, indicate the instructions for user to handle the device at the deployment phase.In this case, it can be concluded that root cause of the failure reported is due to an incorrect depth on the needle insertion's, however; it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As part of mitek¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|