• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number NV-6-20-HELIX
Device Problems Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Stretched (1601); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 02/16/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information regarding a concerto coil that had a detachment issue, was stretched with part of the detached coil extending into the parent artery.The patient was undergoing treatment in collateral off of left subclavian artery coil embolization.The location was in the middle of the artery.The patient¿s vessel tortuosity was moderate, and there was no calcification.There were no abnormalities in relation to the patient¿s anatomy.It was reported that the device was prepared per the instructions for use (ifu) with no issues identified.There was an unspecified issue with the detachment of the coil and the coil had resistance and was stretched and pulled so that half of the coil was within the coil pack at the intended location in the collateral off of the left subclavian artery.And the other half extended out, traversing the patient's descending aorta to the right common iliac artery.It was noted that patient vessel tortuosity was moderate.There were no other patient anatomy abnormalities.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received indicated the patient was undergoing treatment of an aneurysm collateral off of the proximal left subclavian artery.It was clarified that the report of "resistance felt when the device broke" to mean there was difficulty with deployment of the coil.It was noted the coil may have been slightly oversized relative to the vessel, and appeared to kick the catheter out a minimal amount.The physician felt comfortable deploying with the instant detacher and noted the coil did not appear to detach correctly.The physician then attempted to withdraw the coil, and it appeared to be stuck in the catheter (merit swift ninja microcatheter).The manual detachment method was not used, and a couple detachment attempts were made with the instant detacher.The physician decided to complete treatment another day, and the coil pack was successfully removed on (b)(6) 2020 via endovascular approach.There was no harm to the patient and they were currently asymptomatic.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO NYLON
Type of Device
DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key11349011
MDR Text Key232572019
Report Number2029214-2021-00189
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K090046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/12/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2023
Device Model NumberNV-6-20-HELIX
Device Catalogue NumberNV-6-20-HELIX
Device Lot NumberB110655
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/16/2021
Initial Date FDA Received02/19/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/24/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/12/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age7 MO
Patient Weight7
-
-