As reported, during a ureteroscopy laser lithotripsy and using a ncircle tipless stone extractor, the basket head separated from the device and had to be retrieved from the patient.No known adverse effects have been reported.Additional patient and event information has been requested.
|
Additional information: d10, h3: a tracking number was received, so it has been confirmed that the device will be returned.The event is currently under investigation.A follow-up report will be submitted upon receipt of additional information or completion of the investigation.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary as reported, during a ureteroscopy laser lithotripsy and using a ncircle tipless stone extractor, the basket head separated from the device and had to be retrieved from the patient.No known adverse effects have been reported.Investigation - evaluation.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.One ncircle tipless stone extractor was returned for investigation with the handle in the closed position.The male luer lock adapter (mlla) was loose, and the collet knob was tight and secure.The polyethylene terephthalate tubing measured 4.5cm in length.The basket sheath measured 114.2cm in length.The basket formation was severed from the coil assembly and returned in a bag.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.There were no identified gaps in the manufacturing instructions or quality control procedures.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is included with instructions for use which caution, ¿enclose the device in the sheath before removing from the tray/holder,¿ and, ¿do not use excessive force to manipulate this device.Damage to the device may occur.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that a cause for the event could not be established.It is possible that excessive force was applied to the device during use, causing the wires to break.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|