Model Number 0998-00-0800-52 |
Device Problems
Device Alarm System (1012); Alarm Not Visible (1022)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 02/03/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A getinge field service engineer (fse) evaluated the iabp unit with trainer.No alarm or error were encountered, however, from recent faults list coded 77, 02 and 55 were found in the log records.500 hrs.Kit were requested to replaced on jan 25 during pm.Due to code 02 and 55, the executive processor board was recommended to replace as well.Unit was not released for use.Service was not completed.A supplemental report will be submitted when final service report becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during use on a patient, the cardiosave intra-aortic balloon pump (iabp) had an alarm without any error displayed on the screen.The user swap the unit to a different iabp and continue with the treatment.There was no harm or injury to the patient and no adverse event was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(investigation findings, component codes, health effect ¿ impact codes, investigation conclusions), corrected fields: (medical device ¿ problem code) the getinge field service engineer (fse) returned to the customer's site at a later date and replaced the alarm daughterboard.Subsequently, the stm completed all safety, functionality, and calibration checks and all tests passed to factory specifications.The iabp unit was cleared for clinical use and released to the customer.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during use on a patient, the cardiosave intra-aortic balloon pump (iabp) had an alarm without any error displayed on the screen.The user swap the unit to a different iabp and continue with the treatment.There was no harm or injury to the patient and no adverse event was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Analysis of production: (3331) the device history record review concluded that there were no ncmrs, rework, or deviations documented for the reported lot/serial number.Based on the dhr/lhr review results, it was determined that there is no relation between the manufacturing process and the reported failure.Historical data analysis: (4109) the review of the historical data indicates that no other similar complaint was reported for the same lot/serial number and reported failure mode.Trend analysis: (4110) the overall 24 month product complaint trend data for the period mar 2019 through feb 2021 was reviewed.There were no triggers identified for the review period.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|