As the device remains implanted, a further investigation on the device cannot be performed.The customer was requested to make images available so that an imaging evaluation can be done.Cbas® heparin surface incorporates cbas-heparin manufactured from heparin sodium api, which is covalently bound to the device surface and is essentially non-eluting.
|
H6 evaluation codes investigation findings 213 refers to the phr-reviews: phr- review: a review of the manufacturing records indicated the lot met pre-release manufacturing specifications.Phr review heparin coatings: a review of the manufacturing records indicated the lot met pre-release manufacturing specifications.Phr-review sterilization: a review of these records indicate the lot met all pre-release specifications.Imaging evaluation summary: one time point available for evaluation: intra-operative angiogram images dated (b)(6) 2020.8:47:00 there appears to be areas of stenosis or partial occlusions in the left sfa (superficial femoral artery).9:11:38 image appears to show a possible pta (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) balloon in the left sfa.9:17:10 images appear to show the left sfa, post pta, to be patent.9:18:01 image appears to show the pta balloon again.9:26:02 image appears to show an underployed stent in the left sfa.9:49:25 image appears to show a deployed stent in the left sfa.9:51:02 there appears to be flow through the implanted stent.The left sfa appears to be patent.9:51:54, 9:52:50, and 9:54:38 images appear to show patency of vessels distal to the implanted stent into the left ankle and foot.Product investigation report conclusion: the specific cause of this complaint could not be determined.Gore did not receive the explanted device, and information regarding the device form was not available.A product history review was conducted for the vsx device in this complaint, and the review of the manufacturing records, including the device manufacturing, heparin coating, and sterilization processes, indicated the lot met pre-release manufacturing specifications.The imaging provided to gore indicates the vessel / stent graft were patent after the index procedure, but no images were provided representing the (b)(6) 2021 dates in the complaint.The investigation confirms the subsequent occlusion but is unable to assign cause.There are potential failure modes identified for which cause is possible, but no conclusion can be drawn because evaluation of the device was not possible.
|