Initial and final report on (b)(6) 2021.A customer called hologic to report two failed runs.One was an aptima combo 2 (ac2) run and another was an aptima human papillomavirus (ahpv) run.Technical support (ts) reviewed logs and confirmed a delay in auto detect (ad) that could have impacted the aptima hpv results wl 103070.However, the ad delay did not impact the ac2 assay results, as the run was invalidated.The affected run was from (b)(6) 2021.Logs from (b)(6) 2021, were requested from the customer for hologic to review any trends before and after the affected run.Hologic identified and informed the customer that there were eleven (11) potential hpv false positive samples and recommended retesting.Customer confirmed that the affected results were released, but could not confirm if treatments were provided.Customer also informed hologic that their laboratory management decided they would not retest the eleven samples since the quality control they ran was valid.Customer was provided guidance on what to check on the instrument that may have caused the problem.From log review, hologic determined that the ad issue appeared to have recovered by itself on (b)(6) 2021, and (b)(6) 2021, given that the system has produced 4 valid runs.Ts reviewed additional logs from (b)(6) 2021, and did not see ad delay.Per risk assessment, the severity associated with a false positive result using the aptima hpv assay is serious.To mitigate this risk, hologic requested the customer to retest the samples in question.If the patient received a false positive result for hpv, the potential impact to the patient would be inconvenience, anxiety, and over-testing.If the false positive result was obtained during repeat co-testing, a colposcopy is recommended.
|