(b)(6).(b)(4).The complainant indicated that the device is implanted and is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
Note: this manufacturer report pertains to one of two devices used during the same procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that the patient was diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence and cystocele.On (b)(6) 2017, she was implanted with uphold (tm) lite with capio slim and lynx suprapubic mid-urethral sling system during a pubovaginal sling, anterior repair, and cystoscopy procedure.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent excision of vaginal mesh procedure due to multiple urinary tract infections, urinary retention, difficulty urinating, painful voiding, bladder spasm, and incomplete bladder emptying.Additionally, extensive scarring was also noticed from previous vaginal surgery.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent total anterior compartment mesh removal and cystoscopy with ureteral catheter placement due to chronic pelvic pain and complications related to vaginal mesh insertion.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent robotic/laparoscopic pre-vesical excision of pelvic mesh due to a retained pelvic mesh, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia.During the procedure, bilateral retropubic mesh arms were visualized and extracted.A cystoscopy procedure was performed and showed no injury to the vaginal lateral or nervous structure.
|