MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENVEO PRO DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number ENVPRO-16 |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/03/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was discarded, therefore no product analysis can be performed.Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve into a patient with significant calcification and tortuous anatomy, additional force was required to advance the delivery catheter system (dcs) past curves and bends in the anatomy.There was difficulty passing the aortic arch, and when entering, the dcs handle broke apart.There was also difficulty advancing the delivery catheter system (dcs) in the who arterial pathway.From the femoral artery to the aortic valve.The physician was able to press the two parts of the handle together, and successfully implant the valve.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Conclusion: the delivery catheter system (dcs) was discarded; therefore no product analysis could be performed.Images were not received for review.The reported event indicates that there was difficulty advancing the dcs from the femoral artery to the aortic valve.Difficulties advancing the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique, including guidewire and introducer sheath selection.In this case, it was noted that presented with significant calcification and tortuous anatomy.This indicates that the probable cause of the advancement difficulties was patient anatomy.It was reported that when entering the patient¿s aortic arch, the handle separated.Actuator separation is typically associated with broken or damaged snap fit tabs, either one tab or both, which hold the handle together.The lot number of the subject dcs is not known, and therefore a device history record (dhr) review could not be performed.However, manufacturing controls are in place to ensure that the device met specification requirements prior to release from the manufacturing facility.Updated h6 - eval results and eval conclusion codes.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|