The implanting clinician had discussed with the patient the possibility of removing the stimulator.The clinical representative asked the implanting clinician to seek guidance from stimwave cmo on the occurrence.The cmo and the implanting clinician discussed the event.They determined that the wound not healing might be related to a reaction to the silk stitches or pocket being too superficial.The implanting clinician and the cmo decided to perform a pocket revision to aid with the wound healing.On (b)(6) 2021, the implanting clinician performed the pocket revision and prescribed antibiotics for ten days (name and dosage unknown).The patient was instructed to follow-up with the implanting clinician in ten days as long as no medical emergency occurs.The clinical representative confirmed that the implant procedure was performed in a sterile environment, sterile field handling protocols were used, the procedure was completed in accordance with the product instructions for use, and the sterile barriers of all product used were intact prior to implant a stimwave representative conducted a review of sterilization and packaging records for the respective product lot; stimwave has confirmed that the product was delivered sterile, validated sterilization parameters were used, and sterile barriers were verified to be intact following packaging.Based on this information, the wound not healing was confirmed/replicated.There is no evidence that the product did not meet specifications, and the stimulator is used to treat pain.The cause of the wound not healing is due to a reaction to the silk stitches or pocket being too superficial.
|