It was reported to gore that patient underwent endovascular treatment for a claudication of the left lower limb with a gore® propaten® vascular graft thin walled.It was stated that the prosthesis was implanted on (b)(6) , 2017 as an above the knee femoro-popliteal bypass.Reportedly, on (b)(6) , 2021, after about 4 years, the proximal part of the prosthesis was explanted due to an infection.
|
Explant scientist observations: the abluminal surface was partially covered in light tan/brown tissue with multifocal areas of dark red/brown tissue present.The observable luminal surface contained dark red/brown tissue.The luminal patency could not be determined with the information/images provided.Both extremities were transected, beveled, and ovular in manner.Blue, monofilament, running suture was present around the edge of extremity b (presumptive anastomosis).Multiple evenly spaced serration marks (consistent with forceps/clamps) were present along the segment, on the abluminal surface.The device segment was partially flattened along its length.The segment was approximately 40 mm in length and presented in a j-shape.From gross images, all material disruptions (i.E., material transections/cuts, evenly spaced serration marks, blue running suture), appear to be consistent with cutting by sharp surgical instruments (i.E., scalpel or scissors), grasping/pulling with surgical instrumentation (i.E., hemostat or forceps), and anastomotic suturing, likely used during surgical procedure(s).Request for additional analysis: no.Reason: based on the explant scientist¿s review of the geprovas report, no additional analysis is requested.The reported reason for removal was infection, type and source were not provided, additionally there was no direct association towards gore¿s device and the reason for removal from the physician.
|