• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION FLIXENE VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION FLIXENE VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
On completion of the investigation a follow up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
Article received: go, c.E.(2020).Comparable patency of open and hybrid treatment of venous anastomotic lesions in thrombosed haemodialysis grafts.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 897-903.Purpose: this study aimed to describe outcomes after hybrid intervention compared with open revision (patch venoplasty or jump bypass) of the va in thrombosed avgs.Method: retrospective cohort study.Consecutive patients with a thrombosed avg who underwent thrombectomy between january 2014 and july 2018.Conclusion: hybrid interventions for thrombosed avgs are not associated with worse patency at six and 12 months compared with open revision.Per the article adverse events included occlusion, bleeding, swelling, thrombosis and infection.
 
Event Description
N/a.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Article received: go, c.E.(2020).Comparable patency of open and hybrid treatment of venous anastomotic lesions in thrombosed haemodialysis grafts.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 897-903.The subject article is a single-center retrospective cohort study of 97 consecutive patients with a thrombosed arteriovenous graft (avg) who underwent thrombectomy between (b)(6) 2014 and (b)(6) 2018.Arteriovenous graft failures are typically associated with venous anastomotic (va) stenosis.This study aimed to describe outcomes after hybrid intervention compared with open revision (patch venoplasty or jump bypass) of the va in thrombosed avgs.This complaint is based on information found within a article/literature review.There was no product that was available for evaluation, therefore a device evaluation could not be conducted and the complaint cannot be confirmed.The author of the article did not report any major adverse patient effects as result of this event.A device history record (dhr) review was unable to be performed as the device product part number and lot number was not provided within the article.Attempts to obtain the device lot information was conducted but unsuccessful.The hazardous situation/harm is addressed in the risk file and is operating within its risk profile.There was no evidence within the article that the device was the cause of the reported event.The complaint history review did not identify an adverse trend, therefore no escalation to capa process is required.Conclusion: the instructions for use clearly states that potential adverse reactions of flixene vascular graft include, but may be not limited to: thrombosis, formation of pseudo-aneurysm due to excessive, localized, multiple and/or large needle punctures, perigraft hematoma formation, perigraft seroma formation or ultrafiltration, excessive needle hole elongation, mechanical disruption, material separation, delamination or tearing of the graft material, suture line or host vessel which may result in extreme blood loss, loss of limb function, loss of limb or possible death.Considering study design, that results were comparable to other clinical publications, noting possible risks and complications that can occur as a result of use of flixene vascular graft and fact that hybrid interventions for thrombosed avgs are not associated with worse patency at six and 12 months compared with open revision, one can infer that the getinge¿s flixene vascular grafts performed as expected.H3 other text : not available for return.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLIXENE VASCULAR GRAFT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT, OF 6MM AND GREATER DIAMETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION
40 continental blvd
merrimack NH
Manufacturer (Section G)
ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION
40 continental blvd
merrimack NH
Manufacturer Contact
lori gosselin
40 continental blvd
merrimack, NH 
MDR Report Key11558925
MDR Text Key241927339
Report Number3011175548-2021-00362
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/18/2021
Initial Date FDA Received03/23/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/27/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-